THREE KEPLERIAN ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE HOMOGENEOUS UNIVERSE

Authors

  • Francisco Javier Luna Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol8Iss2a221

Keywords:

cosmology, infinity, astronomy, modern science, celestial physics

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze three arguments wielded by Johannes Kepler in his polemic against the cosmology of Giordano Bruno. It has been found that there is a fundamental difference between the approach of Bruno, who made the idea of an infinite universe based on his natural philosophy, and Kepler, who opted for a concentric finite universe for his astronomical system. Although there are differences between the two authors mentioned, I argue that there is also a progressive approach of Kepler to some Bruno’s theses.

References

Arisó Cruz, Albert, “La noción de lugar en la metafísica aristotélica”, Thémata Revista de Filosofía, No. 45, 2012, pp. 35-50.

Berti, Domenico, Vita di Giordanno Bruno di Nola, Paravia e comp., Turín, 1868.

Boner, Patrick, “Kepler’s vitalistic wiew of the heavens” en: Granada , Miguel Ángel, Novas y cometas entre 1572 y 1618, Publicacions i edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 2012, pp. 165-193.

Bruno, Giorda no, Sobre el universo infinito y los mundos, trad. de Ángel Cappelletti, Terramar, La Plata, 2008.

Field, J.V., Kepler’s geometrical cosmology, The Anthlone Press, Londres, 1988.

Granada , Miguel Ángel, “Kepler and Bruno on the infinity of the universe and solar system”, Journal for the History of the Astronomy, vol. XXXIX, 2008, pp. 469-495.

Hales, Thomas C., “A proof of the Kepler conjecture”, Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 162, 3, 2005, pp. 1065-1185.

Hansch, Michael Gottlieb, Epistolae ad Joannem Kepplerum mathematicum caesareum scriptae, vol., Frankfurt & Leipzig, 1718.

Harrison, Edward, Darkness at Night: A Riddle of the Universe, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1987.

Heida rzad eh, Tofigh, A History of Physical Theories of Comets, From Aristotle to Whipple, Springer, Dordrecht, 2008.

Jak i, Stanley L., “Olbers’, Halley’s, or Whose Paradox?”, Americal Journal of Physics, 35, 3, pp. 200-210.

Kepler, Johannes, Astronomi Opera Omnia, vol., Christian Frisch, Heyder & Zimmer, Frankfurt, 1863.

------------------------, Conversación con el mensajero sideral, trad. de Carlos Solís, Alianza, Madrid, 2007.

------------------------, El secreto del Universo, trad. de Eloy Rada, Alianza, Madrid, 1992.

------------------------, Gesammelte Werke, Vol. I, Ed. Max Caspar, C. H. Beck’sche Verlangbuchandlung, Munich, 1938.

------------------------, Regalo festivo o De la nieve sexángula, trad. de Vidal González, Libros en Casa, Málaga, 2010.

Koyré, Alexandre, Del mundo cerrado al universo infinito, trad. de Carlos Solís, Siglo XXI, Madrid, 1999.

Westman, Robert S., The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Luna, Francisco Javier. 2018. “THREE KEPLERIAN ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE HOMOGENEOUS UNIVERSE”. Síntesis. Philosophy Journal 8 (2): 89-104. https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol8Iss2a221.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 45

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.