Richir, Tarkovsky and the Zone of Affectivity

Authors

  • Philip Flock Bergische Universität Wuppertal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol6Iss2a430

Keywords:

Phenomenological Aesthetics, Affectivity, Architectonics, Richir, Tarkovsky, Philosophy of Cinema, a Thinking of the Zone, Immanence and Transcendence, Humanization and Humanity.

Abstract

The object of investigation is a systematic comparison between Marc Richir’s phenomenology of affectivity and Andrei Tarkovsky’s conception of film as a living image of time, illustrated by the work “Stalker”. The idea of “archaic” or “elementary” affectivity serves as a tertium comparationis. Such a philosophical and aesthetic reflection opens the possibility of examining and reconfiguring the architectural status of classical ideas of philosophy. Both theorists treat the opposition of immanence and transcendence in a way that subverts the basic metahphysical position of ego, world and God and replaces it with a thinking of threshold, transition, or transposition. In the light of Richir, the structure of the “zone” can be read as a hyperbolic phenomenon. Only amid its simulacra and instabilities does humanity emerge as an enigma, i.e. as the self-reflexivity of a self-evolving sense of formation. This reflexivity is phenomenalized, according to our further thesis, on this side of the distinction between thinking and feeling. The essay is an attempt to contribute to phenomenological aesthetics. By means of a constellation analysis, general architectural isomorphies and coherences of both approaches are highlighted in a first approach.

References

Arnheim, Rudolf. 1979. Kritiken und Aufsätze zum Film. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer Verlag.

Bird, Robert. 2008. Andrei Tarkovsky. Elements of Cinema. London: Reaktion Books.

Boyadzhieva, Lyudmila. 2014. Andrei Tarkovsky. A life on the cross. London: Glasgoslav Publications.

Flock, Philip 2021. Das Phänomenologische und das Symbolische. Marc Richirs Phänomenologie der Sinnbildung. Phaenomenologica 234. Cham: Springer International.

Franz, Norbert P. (Hrsg.). 2016. Andrej Tarkovskij. Beiträge zum Ersten Inter-nationalen Tarkovskij-Symposium an der Universität Potsdam. Band 1. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.

Gianvito, John (Hrsg.). 2006. Andrei Tarkovsky: interviews. Mississippi: University Press.

Gillespie, David. 2003. Russian Cinema. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited Harlow.

Green, Peter. 1993. Andrei Tarkovsky. The Winding Quest. London: MacMillan Press.

Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch. Husserliana, Bd. III/1. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff.

Husserl, Edmund.1980. Phantasie, Bildbewußtsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Husserliana, Bd. XXIII. Den Haag : M. Nijhoff.

Martin, Sean. 2005. Andrei Tarkovsky. Vermont: Trafalgar Square Publishing.

Mayer, Michael. 2012. Tarkowskijs Gehirn. Über das Kino als Ort der Konversion. Bielefeld: Transcript.

Mayer, Michael. 2018. Zone. Zürich: Diaphanes.

Richir, Marc. 1970. “Le rien enroulé – Esquisse d’une pensée de la phénoménalisation“. Textures 70, 7-8: 3–24.

Richir, Marc. 1981. Recherches phénoménologiques I, II, III. Fondation pour la phénoménologie transcendantale. Bruxelles: Ousia.

Richir, Marc. 1987. “Métaphysique et Phénoménologie. Sur le sens du renversement critique kantien.“ La liberté de l’Esprit 14 : 99-155.

Richir, Marc. 1991. “Passion du penser et pluralité phénoménologique des mondes.“ Epokhè 2: 113-173.

Richir, Marc. 1997. “Le Cinéma – Artefact et simulacre.“ Protée 25-1: 79-89.

Richir, Marc. 2002. “Art et Artefact.“ Utopia 3: 62-75.

Richir, Marc. 2003. “Du rôle de la phantasia au théâtre et dans le roman.“ Littérature 132: 24-33.

Richir, Marc.2008. “La refonte de la phénoménologie.“ Annales de phénoménologie 7: 199-212.

Richir, Marc. 2010. Variations sur le sublime et le soi. Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.

Richir, Marc. 2011. “Le sens de la phénoménologie.“ In La phénoménologie comme philosophie première, K. Novotny, A. Schnell, L. Tengelyi (Hrsg.), 115-125. A.P.P. Mémoires des Annales de Phénoménologie X.

Richir, Marc, 2014a. La contingence du despote. Paris: Payot.

Richir, Marc, 2014b. L’écart et le rien. Conversations avec Sacha Carlson. Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.

Robinson, Jeremy Mark. 2006. The Sacred Cinema of Andrei Tarkovsky. Kent: Crescent Moon Publishing.

Skakov, Nariman. 2012. The Cinema of Tarkovsky. Labyrinths of Space and Time. London: I.B. Tauris.

Tarkowskij, Andrej. 1980. Stalker. Spielfilm. Moskva: Mosfil’m, 1980. Regie: Andrej Tarkowskij. Drehbuch: Andrej Tarkowskij /Arkadij und Boris Strugackij nach deren Povest’ Picknick na obočine unter Verwendung eines Gedichts von F. Tjutčev. Kamera: Aleksandr Knjažinskij. Musik: Ėduard Artem’ev unter der Verwendung von Motiven von J. S. Bach. Darsteller: Aleksandr Kajdanovskij (Stalker), Alisa Frejndlich (Stalkers Frau), Anatolij Solonicyn (Schriftsteller), E. Kostin (Wirt), N. Grin’ko (Professor), Nataša Abramova (Tochter des Stalker), u. a., Farbe, 163 Min. [IMDB ID 0079944]

Turovskaya, Maya. 1989. Tarkovsky. Cinema as Poetry. London: Faber and Faber.

Tarkovsky, Andrey. 1994. Time Within Time. The Diaries 1970-1986. Transl. from the Russian by Kitty Hunter-Blair. London: Faber and Faber.

Tarkowskij, Andrej. 2016. Die versiegelte Zeit. Gedanken zur Kunst, zur Ästhetik und Poetik des Films. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-02

How to Cite

Flock, Philip. 2024. “Richir, Tarkovsky and the Zone of Affectivity”. Síntesis. Philosophy Journal 6 (2): 85-111. https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol6Iss2a430.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.