"Speaking is not possible". Blanchot and Hölderlin's impossible speech.

Authors

  • Amanda Olivares Universidad Diego Portales / Université Paris X Nanterre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol3Iss2a327

Keywords:

Law, impossibility, writing, death, Hölder-lin

Abstract

This essay seeks to analyse the language of literature in Maurice Blanchot’s thinking, and its relation to notions as the “sacred,” the fundament, the law and the origin. The unifying thread will be the reading of Friedrich Hölderlin’s oeuvre that Blanchot offers in the essay “The ‘Sacred’ Speech of Hölderlin.” (1946), which addresses Hölderlin’s poem “As on a holiday” (1799). This poem was also discussed by Martin Heidegger in 1941, in an essay bearing the same title. Blanchot takes sides and debates with Heidegger’s essay. I will give an account of Blanchot firm insistence to think language as preceded by a rip and an impossibility, crossed by a questioning of idea of law and the relation of foundation that this idea entails. The essay will highlight  the relevance of the question concerning the legitimacy of philosophical reflection and literature. The intriguing and controversial “right to death” to which Blanchot alludes in “Literature and the right to death” could be better understood by taking into account the analyses developed here.

References

Allemann, Beda. 1965. Hölderlin y Heidegger (Trad. E. García Belsunce). Buenos Aires: Los libros del mirasol.

Benjamin, Walter. 2010. Ensayos escogidos (Trad. H. A. Murena). Buenos Aires: Cuenco de plata.

Blanchot, Maurice. 1949. La part du feu. Paris: Gallimard.

_______. 1955. L’espace littéraire. Paris: Gallimard-folio.

_______. 1971. L’Amitie. Paris: Gallimard.

_______. 2002. El espacio literario (Trad. Vicky Palant y Jorge Jinks). Madrid: Editorial Nacional.

_______. 2007a. La parte del fuego (Trad. Isidro Herrera). Madrid: Arena.

_______. 2007b. La amistad (Trad. J.A. Doval Liz). Madrid: Trotta.

Derrida, Jacques. 2014. The death penalty. Volume I (Trad. Peggy Kamuf). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

_______. 2015. Clamor (Glas) (Trad. Cristina de Peretti y Luis Ferrero Carracedo). Madrid: La Oficina de Arte y Edición.

Fynsk, Christopher. 1996. “Crossing the threshold. On ‘Literature and the right to death’”. In Carolyn Baily Gill (ed.), Maurice Blanchot. The demand of writing. London: Routledge: 70-90.

Gasché, Rodolphe. 1996. “The felicities of paradox. Blanchot on the null space of literatura”. In Carolyn Baily Gill (ed.), Maurice Blanchot. The demand of writing. London: Routledge: 34-69.

Greisch, Jean. 1983. “Hölderlin et le chemin vers le sacré”. In Martin Heidegger, Les Cahiers de L’Herne Martin Heidegger. Paris: Éditions de l’Herne: 403-415.

Hegel, G. W. F. 1939. La Phénoménologie de l’esprit (Trad. Jean Hyppolite). Paris: Aubier.

Heidegger, Martin. 2005. Aclaraciones a la poesía de Hölderlin (Trad. Helena Cortés y Arturo Leyte). Madrid: Alianza.

_______. 2016. Ser y Tiempo (Trad. Jorge Eduardo Rivera). Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.

Hill, Leslie. 1997. Blanchot. Extreme Contemporary. London, New York: Routledge.

Hölderlin, Friedrich. 2001. La muerte de Empédocles (Trad. Feliu Formosa). Barcelona: Acantilado.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Olivares, Amanda. 2020. “‘Speaking Is Not possible’. Blanchot and Hölderlin’s Impossible Speech”. Síntesis. Philosophy Journal 3 (2): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol3Iss2a327.