FROM LOGIC TO ETHIC. SYMPHONY OF LOGOS IN ARISTOTLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol9Iss1a131Keywords:
Logic, Ethies, kóyog, AristótelesAbstract
Aristotle alludes to diverse writings or works in his agreement The Interpretation that does part of the Organon or agreement of Logic: to the Rhetoric, to the Poetics, to of Soul, but one does not find any explicit reference to the Ethics. Nevertheless the reading especially of the chapter 9 of The Interpretation Aristotle suggests a possible link with the Ethics in effect having defined what is the apofantic sentence "kóyog áaocprwt1Kôg" he specifies that it only refers to the present or to the past since for the future one does not give the truth or falsehood: the contingency does not force to the need. For Aristotle the human actions are not certain. In the Ethics to Nicómaco especially in the chapter 6 Aristotle is going to specify what is the human practice and as the logic intervenes in the process of deliberation, decision, action. Then it turns out interesting to note the relations between the Logic and the Ethics in the set of these works, which is correlative with the relations between the truth and the good, the theory and the practice. There is outlined a topic that was rescued in writings of contemporary philosophers.References
Ackr ill, J. L. (2002). Aristotle Categories and de interpretatione. New-York: Oxford University Press.
Anscombe, E. (1994). « Verdad y razonamiento practico ». En Nuestros griegos y sus modernos. Estrategias contemporáneas de apropiación de la Antigüedad. Barbara CASSIN (comp.). Manantial: España, 281-290.
Arendt, H. (2007). La vie de l’esprit. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
Aristoteles. (1985). Ética Nicomaquea. Ética Eudemia. (trad. Julio Pallí Bonet). Madrid: Gredos.
Aristoteles. (1990). Nicomachean Ethics. (trad. in English H.Rackam,11°ed). London: Harvard University Press.
----------------. (1983). The cathegories on interpretation Prior analytics. (7°ed).By H.P.Cooke & H.Tredennick. London : Harvard University Press.
Aubenque, P. (1963). La prudence chez Aristote. Besançon: Presses universitaires de France.
---------------. (2009). « Sens et unité du traité Aristotélicien de l’Interprétation ». En Interpréter de Interpretatione de Suzanne Husson. Paris: Vrin, 37-50.
Correia, M. (2003). La lógica de Aristóteles. Santiago: Ediciones Universitarias Católica de Chile.
Furstenberg, C. (2014). “Los relativos en las categorías Aristóteles”. EIKASIA. Vol 60 : 199-220 Recuperado de: http://revistadefilosofia.com/numero60.htm: 201-222.
---------------------, (2011). L’autonomie s’amenuise, la vulnérabilité affleure, la personne demeure. PARIS: Beaurepaire
Giménez-Amaya, J. y Murillo, J. (2009/1) “Neurociencias y libertad, una aproximación interdisciplinar”. SCRIPTA THEOLOGICA 41 : 13-46
Hadot, P. (1980) « Sur divers sens du mot pragmata dans la tradition philosophique grecque». En concepts et catégories dans la pensée Antique ». Por Pierre Aubenque. Paris: Vrin, 312-316
Joly, A. (2008). « Notes de lectures: de quelques malentendus sur la définition du verbe ». ERIS : 139-149.
Mittelmann, J. (2009). Categorías sobre la interpretación. Buenos Aires: Colección Griegos y latinos, Losada.
Moreau, J. (1980). « Aristote et la vérité antéprédicative ». En Aristote et les problèmes de méthodes. Paris : Vrin, 21-33.
Ricoeur, P. (1997). « A la gloire de la phronesis ». En La vérité pratique. Aristote, Ethique à Nicomaque, Livre VI . Textos compilados por Jean-Yves Château. Paris: Librairie Philosophique Joseph Vrin, 13-22.
Skarica, M. (2003). “Enunciación aprehensiva y enunciación judicativa”. Revista philosophica. Vol 26.
------------. (1998). “Notas sobre de Interpretationes 9”. En Aristóteles. (Actas de las Primeras Jornadas Aristotélicas Argentinas, Mendoza, 1996). Mendoza, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo: H. J. Padron, 97-102.
Toulon-Var : Equipe d’accueil Babel 2649. Association Modèles linguistiques. Recuperado de : http://ml.revues.org/269
Vigo, A. (2006). Estudios Aristotélicos. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Weidemann, H. (2014). Aristóteles de Interpretatione. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Yarza, I. (2011). La racionalidad de la Ética de Aristóteles. Un estudio sobre Ética a Nicómaco. Navarra: EUNSA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the use, transformation, and distribution for any purpose, as long as the author is recognized, and in the event of changes or developements are made from it, the derivate work be shared under the same license.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
