WHY ACCEPT TRASCENDENT UNIVERSALS?

Authors

  • José Tomás Alvarado Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol4Iss2a112

Keywords:

universals, ontology, D. M.Armstrong, epistemology

Abstract

In this work it is argued that if one has to accept universals in our ontology, then one should also accept transcendent universals. Three arguments are presented in favour of this conclusion: (a) the plausibility of accepting the existence of complex universals out of more simple ones; (b) the contingency of the instantiations with respect to the universal instantiated; and (c) the plausible existence of natural laws even when the universals appearing therein are not instantiated. Then several traditional objections against transcendent universals are discussed and, after consideration, found unconvincing.

References

ALVARADO, J. T., «Mundos posibles como universales estructurales máximos. Una conjetura ontológica», Análisis filosófico, 27 N° 2, 2007, pp. 119-143.

. ....., «Qué es el espacio ontológico modal?», Phílosophica, 29,

, pp. 7-44.

ARMSTRONG, D.M., A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1997.

................., Truth trnd Truthhmakers, Cambridge U.P., Cambndge, 2004.

................., Universals An Opinionated Introduction, Boulder, Westview,

........, Universais and Scientific Realism, Cambridge U.P.., Cambridge,

........., What is a law of Nature?, Cambdge U.P., Cambridge, 1983.

BJGELOW, P. y PARGETTER, R., Science and Necessiiy, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1990.

BIRDS, A., Nature Metaphysics. Laws and Properties, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2007.

CAMPBELL, K., «The Metaphysic of Abstract Particulars», Midwest Studies in Philosopy 6, 1981, pp. 477-488.

DRETSKE, F. I, «Laws of Nature», Phiosophy of Science 44, 1977, pp. 248-268.

ELLIS, B., Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 2001.

FORREST, R, «Ways Worlds Could Be», Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 1986, pp. 15-24.

JACKSON, F., «Statements about Universals», Mind 86, 1977, pp. 89-92.

LEWIS, D., «New Work for a Theory of Universals», Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 8-55.

................, ,On the Plurality of Worlds, Blackwell Oxford, 1986.

MELLOR, D.H., The Facts of Causation. Routledge, Londres, 1995.

MUMFORD,S.,Laws in Nature, Routledge, Londres, 2004.

OLIVER, A., «The Metaphysics of Properties», Mind 105, 1996, pp. 1-80.

RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA, G., Resemblance Nominalism. A Solution to the Problem of Universals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002.

SHAPIRO, S., Philosophy of Mathematics. Structure and Ontology. Oxford U.P., Oxford, 1997.

SHOEMAKER, S., «Causality and Properties», en Idenliiy, Cause, and Mind. Philosophical Essays, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003, pp. 206-233.

SIMONS, P., «Particulars in Particular Clothing: Three Trope Theories of Substance», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 1994, pp. 553-575.

STALNAKER, R., «Possible Worlds» en Ways a World Might Be. Metaphysical and AntiMetaphysical Essays, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003.

TOOLEY, M., Causation, A Realist Approach, Clarednon Press, Oxford, 1987.

............, «The nature of Laws», Canadian Joumal of Philosophy 7,

, pp. 667-698.

WLLIAMS, D.C., «Qn the Elements of Being: I», Review of Metaphysics 7, 1953, pp. 2-18.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-23

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Alvarado, José Tomás. 2017. “WHY ACCEPT TRASCENDENT UNIVERSALS?”. Síntesis. Philosophy Journal 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol4Iss2a112.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)