REFINING THE MATERIAL SUBSTANCE: ARISTOTLE’S PROGRAM IN METAPHYSICS H1-5
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol1Iss2a243Mots-clés :
material substance, form, cause, unity, potentiality, actualityRésumé
In Metaph. Z17, Aristotle makes a fresh start (1041a6) in his discussion on substance. Accordingly, the substantial form is principle and cause (1041a6-10, 1041b8), whereas the matter is element (1041b31) of material substances. Besides, Aristotle assumes (probably without justifying in Z17) that material substances are unified wholes (1041b11-12). These are two main theses in Z17 whose apparent absence in the summary of H1 (1042a3-23) has raised doubts among commentators as to the very project of H -a book commonly held to be a bunch of notes on Z. Regarding H’s positive results, commentators mostly focus on the introduction of the modal vocabulary of potentiality and actuality -into which Z’s distinction between matter and form is translated. So they find book’s H proper contribution only in H6’s solution to the problem of unity (1045a23-25, 1045b18-19). As a consequence of this reading, H1-5 remain overshadowed by H6, and therefore they are often neglected. Contrarily to this still predominant trend towards not taking H1-5 on their own, I will here try to show that these chapters develop a program, in which H6’s conclusion is properly prepared. Stations of this program are H2-3, where Aristotle justifies the priority of form, and then H4-5, where he does the same for the unity of material compounds. So, I aim to show that H1-5 are a centerpiece in the completion and fulfilment of Z17’s theory of material substance.
Références
Ackrill, John L. 1972/73. “Aristotle’s Definition of Psuche,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119-133.
Alexander Aphrodisiensis. 1891. In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria, edited by M. Hayduck Berlin: Reimer.
Angioni, Lucas. 2008. As Noçoes Aristotélicas de Substância e Essência. O Livro VII da Metafísica de Aristóteles. Campinas: Unicamp.
Baghdassarian, Fabienne. 2014. “Aristote, Métaphysique H 5: La génération des contraires et la matière,” Elenchos 35/1: 61-88.
Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II. 1-3). Translated with Notes. With a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography by Allan Gotthelf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnes, Jonathan. 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by J. B. 2 volumes. (Bollingen Series LXXI). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bostock, David. 1994. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Books Z and H. Translated with a Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brancacci, Aldo. 1990. Oikeios logos. La filosofia del linguaggio di Antistene. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Burnyeat, Myles. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Z. Pittsburgh: Mathesis.
Burnyeat, Myles et alii (quoted as Londinensis). 1984. Notes on Books Eta and Theta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Sub-Faculty of Philosophy.
Charles, David. 1994. “Matter and Form: Unity, Persistence, and Identity.” In Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, edited by T. Scaltsas, D. Charles & M.L. Gill, 75-105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Code, Alan. 1984. “The Aporematic Approach to Primary Being in Metaphysics Z.” In New Essays on Aristotle, edited by Francis J. Pelletier and John King-Farlow, 1-20. Guelph (Ontario): University of Calgary Press.
Code, Alan. (unpublished) “Aristotle on the Matter of Corpses in Metaphysics H5.”
Delcomminette, Silvain. 2014. “Métaphysique H 6: Unité de l'ousia, unité de l'eidos,” Elenchos 35/1: 89-125.
Detel, Wolfgang. 2009. Aristoteles, Metaphysik Bücher VII und VIII. Aus dem Griechischen von W. Detel und J. Wildberger. Kommentar von W. Detel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Devereux, Daniel. 2003. “The Relationship between Books Zeta and Eta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 159-211.
Frede, Michael and Patzig, Günther. 1988. Aristoteles, Metaphysik Z. Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. 2 volumes. München: Beck.
Frede, Michael. 1994. “Aristotle’s Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics Θ.” In Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, edited by T. Scaltsas, D. Charles & M.L. Gill, 173-193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galluzzo, Gabriele. 2006. “Metaphysics Z: Contemporary Interpretations.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book Z: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Gabriele Galluzzo and Mauro Mariani, 61-211. Pisa: Edizione della Normale.
Gill, Mary Louise. 1989. Aristotle on Substance. The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gill, Mary Louise. 1996. “Metaphysics H 1-5 on Perceptible Substances.” In Aristoteles, Metaphysik. Die Substanzbücher (Z, H, Θ), edited by C. Rapp, 209-228. Berlin: Akademie.
Gill, Mary Louise. 2006. “First Philosophy in Aristotle.” In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, edited by M. L. Gill and Pierre Pellegrin, 347-373. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gill, Mary Louise. 2010. “Unity of Definition in Metaphysics H.6 and Z.12.” In Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, edited by James G. Lennox and Robert Bolton, 97-121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. Wonderful Life. The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: Norton.
Harte, Verity. 1996. “Aristotle’s Metaphysics H 6 − a Dialectic with Platonism,” Phronesis 41: 276-304.
Hussey, Edward. 1983. Aristotle, Physics. Books III and IV. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaeger, W. 1957. Aristotelis Metaphysica. Recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit W. J. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kosman, L. A. 1969. “Aristotle’s Definition of Motion,” Phronesis 14: 40-62.
Kosman, L. A. 1987. “Animals and Other Beings in Aristotle.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, edited by Allan Gotthelf and James Lennox, 360-391. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, Frank. 1996. “Aristotle on the Unity of Substance.” In Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle, edited by Frank Lewis and Robert Bolton, 39-81. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
Lewis, Frank. 2013. How Aristotle gets by in Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. 1992. A Greek-English Lexicon. Compiled by L. and S. Revised and augmented throughout by Sir H. Stuart Jones with the assistance of R. McKenzie and with the co-operation of many scholars. With a Supplement (1968) edited by E. A. Barber with the assistance of P. Maas, M. Scheller and M. L. West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loux, Michael. 1991. Primary Ousia. An Essay on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z and H. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
Loux, Michael. 1995. “Composition and Unity: An Examination of Metaphysics H 6.” In The Crossroads of Norm and Nature, edited by May Sim, 247-279. Lanham (Maryland): Rowman & Littlefield.
Makin, Stephen. 2006. Aristotle, Metaphysics Book Θ. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menn, Stephen. The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics (unpublished, available at: https://www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/antike/mitarbeiter/menn/contents )
Morel, Pierre-Marie. 2015. Aristote, Métaphysique Livre Èta. Introduction, traduction et commentaire. Parin: Vrin.
Pfeiffer, Christian. 2016. “Metaphysik H.” (unpublished).
Rapp, Christof. 2018. “Diaphorai in Aristotle, Metaphysics H 2.” (unpublished).
Rhenius, Ralph. 2005. Die Einheit der Substanzen bei Aristoteles, Berlin: Akademie.
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle. Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle, Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross. W. D. 1949. Aristotle, Prior and Posterior Analytics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seminara, Simone. 2014. Matter and Explanation. On Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book H. Universitè de Lyon - Roma Tre University (Doctoral dissertation; unpublished).
Seminara, Simone. 2018. “Are there Two Accounts of Hylomorphism in Metaphysics Book H?” Méthexis 30: 98-112.
Steinfath, Holmer. 1996. “Die Einheit der Definition und die Einheit der Substanz. Zum Verhältnis von Met. Z 12 und H 6.” In Aristoteles, Metaphysik. Die Substanzbücher (Z, H, Θ), edited by C. Rapp, 229-251. Berlin: Akademie.
Vigo, Alejandro 1995. Aristóteles, Física. Libros III-IV. Traducción, introducción y comentario. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Wedin, Michael. 2000. Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. The Categories and Metaphysics Z. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yu, J. 1997. “Two Conceptions of Hylomorphism in Metaphysics ZHΘ,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 15: 119-145.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs et autrices qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les conditions suivantes :
- Les auteurs et autrices conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication de leur œuvre. Celle-ci est simultanément soumise à la licence Creative Commons Attribution – Partage dans les mêmes conditions 4.0 International, qui autorise l’utilisation, la modification et la diffusion de l’œuvre à toute fin, à condition que la paternité de l’œuvre soit reconnue et que, lorsque des modifications ou des développements sont réalisés à partir de celle-ci, l’œuvre dérivée soit diffusée sous la même licence.
- Les auteurs et autrices peuvent conclure d’autres accords de licence non exclusive pour la diffusion de la version publiée de leur œuvre (par exemple, en la déposant dans une archive institutionnelle en ligne ou en la publiant dans un ouvrage collectif ou monographique).
- Les auteurs et autrices sont autorisés et encouragés à diffuser leur travail sur Internet (par exemple, dans des archives institutionnelles en ligne ou sur leur site personnel) avant et pendant le processus de soumission. Cette pratique peut favoriser des échanges scientifiques fructueux et accroître le nombre de citations de l’œuvre publiée. (Voir L’effet du libre accès).
