WHY IS THERE A ‘BEFORE’ AND AN ‘AFTER’? ARISTOTLE’S POSITION IN PHYSICS IV 11, 219a10-19

Authors

  • Paloma Baño Henriquez Universidad de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol1Iss2a242

Keywords:

Aristotle, physics, time, anterior and posterior

Abstract

The reference to an order anterior-posterior is part of Aristotle’s definition of time. One can therefore as­sume that, in addition to the temporal sense usually attributed to it, the conceptual pair anterior-posterior must also have a distinct sense on which the temporal one depends. This idea seems to be substantiated by Aristotle’s thesis that time follows change and change follows magnitude. According to this thesis the order anterior-posterior of time originates in an order ante­rior-posterior of the change, which in turn originates in an order anterior-posterior of the magnitude cov­ered by that change. The article analyses this thesis in detail. In doing so it focuses on the difficulties for the understanding of the anterior and posterior of the magnitude, that is the level on which ultimately de­pends the possibility to explain the existence of a before and an after in time. The interpretation offered here intends to confirm this dependence and to make it comprehensible.

References

Aristóteles. Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. de L. Minio-Paluello, Oxford, 1949.

Aristóteles. Du Ciel, ed. de P. Moreaux, Paris, 1965.

Aristóteles. Metaphysika, ed. de W. Jaeger, Oxford, 1957.

Aristóteles. Physica, ed. de W. D. Ross, Oxford, 1950.

Aoiz, J. 2007. Alma y tiempo en Aristóteles, Caracas.

Bergson, H. 1889. Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience, Paris, 41991 (reimpresión de 1889).

Böhme, G. 1974. Zeit und Wahl. Studien zur Zeittheorie bei Platon, Aristoteles, Leibniz und Kant, Frankfurt a. M.

Bostock, D. 2006. “Aristotle’s Account of Time”, en: D. Bostock: Space, Time, Matter, and Form, Oxford, 2006, 135-157 (Reimpresión de “Aristotle’s Account of Time”, Phronesis, 25, 148-169).

Conen, P. 1964. Die Zeittheorie des Aristoteles, München.

Coope, U. 2005. Time for Aristotle. Physics IV 10-14, Oxford.

Corish, D. 1976. “Aristotle’s Attempted Derivation of Temporal Order from That of Movement and Space”, en: Phronesis, 21, 241-251.

Goldschmidt, V. 1982. Temps physique et temps tragique chez Aristote. Commentaire sur le Quatrième livre de la Physique (10-14) et sur la Poétique, Paris.

Hussey, E. 1983. Aristotle. Physics. Books III and IV, translated with an introduction and notes by E. Hussey, Oxford.

Kuhlmann, H. 1988. “„Jetzt“? Zur Konzeption des νῦν in der Zeitabhandlung des Aristoteles (Physik IV 10-14)”, en: Rudolph, E. (ed.): Zeit, Bewegung, Handlung. Studien zur Zeitabhandlung des Aristoteles, Stuttgart, 63-96.

Mesch, W. 2003. Reflektierte Gegenwart. Eine Studie über Zeit und Ewigkeit bei Platon, Aristoteles, Plotin und Augustinus, Frankfurt a. M.

Owen, G. E. L. 1979. “Aristotle on time”, en: Barnes, J., Schofield, M. y Sorabji, R. (Ed.): Articles on Aristotle, Band 3, London, 1979, 140-158 (Reimpresión de “Aristotle on time”, en: Machamer, P. K. y Turnbull, R. G. (ed.): Motion and Time, Space and Matter: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science, Columbus, Ohio, 1976, 3-27).

Rey Puente, F. 2001. Os sentidos do tempo em Aristóteles, São Paulo.

Roark, T. 2011. Aristotle on Time. A Study of the Physics, Cambridge.

Rosen, J. 2015. “Physics V-VI versus VIII: Unity of change and disunity in the Physics”, en: Leunissen, M. (ed.): Aristotle’s Physics. A Critical Guide, Cambridge, 206-224.

Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics, a revised text with introduction and commentary, Oxford, 1998 (Reimpresión de 1936).

Simplicius: In Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Octo Commentaria, ed. H. Diels, Berlin, 1882-1885.

Torstrik, A. 1867. “Ueber die abhandlung des Aristoteles von der zeit, Phys. Δ 10 ff.”, en: Philologus, 26, 446-523.

Vigo, A. 1990. “Orden espacial y orden temporal según Aristóteles (Fís. IV 11, 219a10-21)”, en: Méthexis, 3, 65-83.

Vigo, A. 1995. Aristóteles. Física. Libros III-IV, traducción, introducción y comentario por A. Vigo, Buenos Aires.

Wagner, H. 1967. Aristoteles’ Werke in deutscher Übersetzung. Band 11: Physikvorlesung, übersetzt von H. Wagner, Berlin.

Wieland, W. 1962. Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles, Göttingen.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-17

How to Cite

Baño Henriquez, Paloma. 2018. “WHY IS THERE A ‘BEFORE’ AND AN ‘AFTER’? ARISTOTLE’S POSITION IN PHYSICS IV 11, 219a10-19”. Síntesis. Philosophy Journal 1 (2): 31-53. https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol1Iss2a242.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 54

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.