DARWIN'S CENTENNIAL

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Ossandón Valdés Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol4Iss2a119

Keywords:

Evolution, natural selection, taxonomy, paleontology, enthropy

Abstract

Based on many scientists who contest the evolutionist theory, the author points out that it lacks of any empiric ground. Furthermore, the real author of this theory was Herbert Spencer. Darwin knew it and rejected it because it is not scientific. Really, it is very different from his own doctrine; this doctrine must be defined like that of the natural selection, otherwise, that of the descendence with modification. By means of these mechanisms Darwin expects, according the economic liberal hypothesis, that it will explain all the unlimited variety of species living today in the planet. But not only biologists and paleontologists oppose this theory, but physical Scientists and mathematicians have demonstrated its impossibility.

References

AGUSTÍ, JORDI, La evolución y sus metáforas. Una perspectiva paleobiológica,Tusquets, Barcelona, 1994.

BEHE, MICHAEL J., La Caja Negra de Darwin, trad. Gardini, C., Andrés Bello, Santiago,1999.

BORRUSO, P., El Evolucionismo en Apuros, Criterio Libros, Madrid, 2001.’

GILSON, ÉTIENNE, De Aristóteles a Darwin (y vuelta), trad. Echeverría, Eunsa, Pamplona, 2 ed., 1980.

GRASSET, Evolución de lo viviente, trad. Fernández y Plazacla, [4. Blume, Madrid, 22ed.., 1984.

HOYLE, FRED, El Universo Inteligente, trad. Chabás, Grijalbo, Barcelona, 1984.

NOGAR, RAYMOND, J., O.P., La Evolución y la Fiosofía Cristiana, Herder, Barcelona, 1957.

SALET, G., Dieu et la scíence, en De Rome el D'ailleurs, Janvier-Fevrier, 1992.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-23

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Ossandón Valdés, Juan Carlos. 2017. “DARWIN’S CENTENNIAL”. Síntesis. Philosophy Journal 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol4Iss2a119.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.