Materialism, Matter and Materiality in the Work of Althusser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol4Iss2a357Palabras clave:
Ideology, Marxism, Materialism, Materiality, AlthusserResumen
Over a decade ago, a number of philosophers declared that the time of what they called “the linguistic turn,” that is, a philosophical orientation to language as the sole medium through which reality could be apprehended, had come to an end, having foundered on its own contradictions. In its place, they proposed a turn to objects or things, that is, that to which we were previously told we could gain access only through language or consciousness, insofar as they reflected or represented reality from a position outside of it. Thus, they established the materiality of objects, but at the expense of a dematerialization of language. One of the principal targets of the new materialism was the concept of ideology, to them a realm of ideas, not things. In his famous essay, “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” published in 1970, Althusser preempted the arguments of the new materialism by asserting that ideology does not consist of ideas but exists in the materiality of apparatuses, practices and rituals. Just as importantly, discourse too possessed a materiality and a reality which was the necessary condition of its functions, including the production of meaning.
Referencias
Althusser, Louis. 1969. For Marx. Translated by Ben Brewster. London: Verso.
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 127–186. Translated by Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Althusser, Louis. 1995. “Idéologie et appareils idéologique d’état (Notes pour une recherche).” In Sur la reproduction, 269-314. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Althusser, Louis. 2003. “Three Notes on the Theory of the Discourses.” In The Humanist Controversy and Other Writings, 33–84. Translated by G. M. Goshgarian. London: Verso.
Althusser, Louis. 2006. “Philosophy and Marxism.” In Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978–87, 251-291. Translated by G. M. Goshgarian. London: Verso.
Althusser, Louis. 2014. “On the Cultural Revolution.” Translated by Jason E. Smith. Décalages 1, no. 0: 1–19.
Althusser, Louis. 2015. Reading Capital: The Complete Edition. London: Verso.
Aristotle. 1952. Metaphysics. Translated by Richard Hope. New York: Columbia University Press.
Aubenque, Pierre. 1962. Le problème de l'être chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
Bryant, Levi, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman, eds. 2011. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: Repress.
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Marx, Karl. 1977. Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Trotsky, Leon. 1940. “Balance sheet of the Finnish Events.” Fourth Interna-tional 1, no. 2: 41–44.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
1. Los/as autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y concederán a Síntesis. Revista de Filosofía el derecho de primera publicación de su obra. La obra se publicará simultáneamente bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0), que permite compartir y adaptar el material para cualquier propósito, siempre que se reconozca adecuadamente la autoría y, en caso de realizarse modificaciones o desarrollos a partir de la obra, estos se distribuyan bajo la misma licencia.
2. Los/as autores/as podrán establecer acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada de su obra (por ejemplo, depositarla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla posteriormente en un volumen monográfico), siempre que se reconozca su publicación inicial en Síntesis. Revista de Filosofía.
3. Se permite y recomienda a los/as autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet - por ejemplo, mediante repositorios institucionales o páginas web académicas - antes y durante el proceso de envío, siempre que ello sea compatible con las exigencias de anonimato propias de la evaluación por pares cuando corresponda.





